The Lens of the Multiliteracies Theory
The multiliteracies theory is a
term coined in the mid 1990’s by the New London Group, and includes a pedagogical
framework comprised of four parts: situated practice, critical framing, overt
instruction, and transformed practice. Multiliteracies theory arose as a new
definition of literacy in response to linguistic diversity in classrooms. Many
students are bilingual, and some students speak localized English outside of
school and are unfamiliar with standard English and grammatical structures appropriate
to school (Olthouse, 2013, p 247). A need for a different view of literacy in
the interest of equity was brought up and remains a relevant venture for
educators, and multimodal tools and pedagogy through the lens of the
multiliteracies theory are excellent solutions to both accommodate and challenge
all types of learners.
In one article I will review
(Olthouse, 2013), the author imagines three example cases that describe how the
multiliteracies theory would work in classrooms at the elementary, middle
school, and high school levels. In each example study, unconventional teaching
strategies are used: video games in a third-grade classroom, original
playwriting in a sixth-grade classroom to study Shakespeare, and a summer
reading book club in high school. The author explains how teachers would plan situated
practice, critical framing, overt instruction, and transformed practice in each
of these situations. In the elementary example, students played educational
video games and their teacher created a closed social network that mimics
online game discussion boards for her class to use collaboratively (p 251). The
simple integration of video games into class activities would capture students’
attention, but it would not be enough to engage them academically and encourage
critical thinking. The overt instruction and critical framing facets of the
multiliteracies theory address this; the teacher in the example points out how video
games have many of the same features as text, including thesis, characters,
plot, and setting, as well as invites students to consider questions about whether
or not video games can accomplish a purpose bigger than entertainment (p 251). Prompting
students to ask deeper questions about the tools they are using and how they
connect to the rest of the world are the key to successfully engaging and
challenging students with an academic purpose.
The second article I will review is
a study of the multimodal work of 27 seventh-grade gifted students. The article
focuses on the process of revision in writing, and the way it prompts them to
analyze their work. The study postulates that revision is at the heart of
quality writing, and the focus is teaching revision via multimodality as a way
to serve all students, but especially gifted students or students that
otherwise need challenging. The students in the study wrote original stories,
and then incorporated multimodality by creating drawings, paintings,
sculptures, or incorporating photography, among many other things. The revision
process in this writing project took the form of transmediation, which is
defined as translating a work into a different medium. The students first wrote
their stories, then revisited and analyzed them, seeing how they could do
better work. Some students then created three-dimensional artworks to go along
with it, which prompted them to revise their stories after noticing how the
point of their stories could be clearer. The author noted that transmediation “offered
students deeper insight into their thinking, which allowed them to reflect
about how the story unfolded, creating a clearer overall picture” (p 146). Through
the lens of the multiliteracies theory, teachers created a project that helped students
“develop greater chances for learning via risk-taking” (p 147). Students that
need to be challenged in reading and writing can learn to take risks and revise
their work, and through the “transformed practice” aspect of the
multiliteracies theory, can use a different way of thinking to deepen their
knowledge.
Below I have attached a video that
explains and expands on the multiliteracies theory published by the Illinois
College of Education. Mary Kalantzis and Bill Cope talk about how they have
reframed and expanded upon the traditional multiliteracies theory. I have also
included a link to their website, which features in-depth graphics.
Batchelor, K.
(2018). “My Story Came to Life!”: How Multimodality Can Inspire Revision in
Writing. Gifted Child Today, 41(3), 136-148.
Olthouse, J. M. (2013). Multiliteracies Theory and Gifted
Education. Gifted Child Today, 36(4), 246-253
Great video! thanks for the definitions.
ReplyDelete